| Trans-Canada set for next Gas Line Hurdle |
|
|
|
![]() Gov. Palin AGIA announcement Of the 4 AGIA bids only the TransCanada bid was said to meet all the basic criteria set forth under AGIA. The 5th proposal made outside the AGIA guidelines by North Slope oil major ConocoPhillips was also rejected. Governor Palin, along with Alaska Natural Resources Commissioner Tom Irwin stated that TransCanada proposal meets the 20 state requirements set forth under AGIA and thus would qualify for up to $500 million in matching AGIA state funds. The gasline project is estimated to cost between 20 - 40 billion dollars and take 10 years to complete. The 4 other applicants: AEnergia, Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority, Little Susitna Construction Co (Sinopec) and ConnocoPhillips, were all issued with letters explaining specifically why their proposals were rejected. You can read the letters and about the public comment period for the TransCanada proposal at The Alaska Gasline Project will be one of the largest construction projects in North American history. The project will involve exploration and development of gas fields in the Alaskan Arctic, construction of gas processing facilities at the pipeline head, building of the actual pipeline, along with feeder pipelines, and construction of storage, refining and distribution facilities at the pipelines termination point. TransCanada will most probably take the pipeline south from Prudhoe Bay along the Trans-Alaska Pipeline route to Fairbanks and then head east into Canada and down to the existing gas fields in the Canadian Rockies foothills in Alberta where it will connect to exiting lines into the lower 48. The pipeline is hoped to deliver 4 billion cubic feet of gas a day. Experts predict it will require roughly 50 trillion cubic feet to remain a viable project. Of this 34 trillion cubic feet are currently estimated in known North Slope discoveries with the remaining having to come from new discoveries in areas such as the 10-02 Area of ANWR and the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska to the west of Prudhoe Bay as well as offshore projects. Natural Resources Commissioner Irwin stated keeping access to future gas exploration in the Arctic is vital for the success of the project. Companies such as Pioneer Oil are already exploring for gas in the Brooks Range foothills and near the 10-02 ANWR border in anticipation of the gasline’s construction. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Alaskans Strongly Support ANWR Development
Over 78% percent of Alaskans support exploration and production on the Coastal ...
ANWR Oil – Politics and Logistics
Many in America have felt the pain of high gasoline prices recently and often di...
Facts about the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
The U.S. Department of Energy has a good primer on the Arctic National Wildlife ...
Today's drilling leaves a small footprint
New oil development technology, developed over 30 years on Alaska's North S...
Hastings and Boehner Push ANWR
Washington DC- House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings and...
Arctic OCS Exploration Hopeful
With the Environmental Protection Agency air discharge permits in hand, Shell oi...
Jay Leno on drilling in ANWR
Jay Leno takes the Democrats to task for blocking oil drilling in the Arctic Nat...
Comprehensive Conservation Plan Draft Hearing
Anchorage, AK – The first public comment hearing on the US Fish and Wildli...
|
“Developing ANWR offers an opportunity to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and improve our national security,”
said U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).