|

The Alliance January 22
Mayor Ben Nageak Opening Remarks
Good morning. I'm pleased to be able to meet with all of you today to
discuss our common interests, problems and concerns. For those of you
who have been around as long as I have - and I hate to admit how long
that is but I do remember when dog teams were used for something other
than racing - my appearance as a speaker here is indicative of the progress
that has been made by industry in working with the North Slope Borough.
Together we have created environmentally sound exploration and development
techniques for the Arctic.
In the mid seventies, as exploration and development were first impacting
us on the Slope, many of our Elders attended meeting after meeting with
state and federal officials to voice their concerns over the potential
for catastrophic environmental problems that might arise because of industrial
activities. They were afraid that the noise would affect caribou migration,
whale calving, and the routine of a host of other wildlife on which my
people depend for survival.
Almost 30 years later, our worst fears have never been realized. Industry
on the North Slope can proudly point to an excellent environmental record.
Despite some occasional problems with spills on the North Slope, no unmitigated
disasters have occurred there. The oil industry has been a good neighbor
and partner. They have trained and employed local people. They have contributed
to a variety of causes that have improved the quality of life for my people.
And they have slowly but surely reduced the footprint they leave behind
with each new parcel explored
We all know about this already. We all know that the industry's record
cannot be gauged by one disaster, no matter how far reaching that disaster
was. But because these lands and seas are so precious to my people. the
North Slope Borough took the position of watchdog on development and held
industry to high standards of environmental protection. Industry has responded
by creating standards and techniques we could support with confidence.
So the question now arises as to why we meet so much resistance on the
national level to any industrial activity on the North Slope. The people
who live, work and hunt there believe that development can happen in an
environmentally safe and sound manner. Why then are people outside this
state seemingly so determined to lock this state's resources up in a wide
variety of extremely restrictive environmental bills?
These are bills they would never tolerate in their own states. But Alaska
for most Americans is more of a concept than a reality. They've never
been here but dream about it as an untouched wilderness, the last fragment
of Eden left in our badly damaged world. Many feel that having destroyed
the ecology in their own states, Alaska is their last chance to do things
right. And Alaska is so far away that it is pretty much an "out of sight,
out of mind" issue on their part. Alaska seems so untouched that by saving
it they can make up for the environmental devastation created in their
own back yards. Unfortunately, they equate balancing environmental concerns
with the kind of restrictive legislation that can destroy our local economy.
Those of us who live on the North Slope also question the sincerity of
government officials who claim they are saving the North Slope from environmental
devastation while fighting us as hard as they can over the issue of cleaning
up sites that were contaminated by the Department of Defense. After many
years of arguing and litigation, we are finally sitting down with representatives
of the military to talk about clean up of Barrow's landfill - a landfill
built by Navy CBs in 1947 and used to dump any and everything the Navy
wanted to get rid of. Even the military now admits that they kept no records
of what was buried in our landfill - a landfill that is not more than
a hundred feet from our ocean. How can they complain about industry's
environmental record when they are still unwilling to face the pollution
they caused in the Arctic?
As we enter the new millennium. I can think of no greater task before
us than that of explaining Alaska to the rest of this country in a way
that permits them to grasp the greatness and vastness of this state and
it's resources. it is our responsibility as government and business leaders
to show people that Alaskans are good stewards of their land and would
not allow it to be degraded for any reason. And then we have to explain
to people that development does not mean irreversible degradation of any
ecosystem when done in an environmentally responsible fashion. It's at
that point that our hardest battle begins - educating people to the fact
that industry can produce cost efficient results in an environmentally
sound process.
As an example of what people in the lower '48 read about Alaska, let
me quote the opening of a recent article in the December 1998 Outside
Magazine. In it, Dirk Olin wrote:
"The vast, treeless expanse of arctic coastal plain that lies along Alaska's
frozen northwest shoulder may look like a wasteland, but each summer this
immense sweep of water-braided permafrost hosts a teeming spectacle of
life. In late spring, North America's biggest caribou herd, nearly half-a-million
strong, thunders across the spongy hummocks of sedge, lichen, and moss
to breed in its traditional calving zones. Between May and June. millions
of migratory wildfowl pierce the pale light to converge on hundreds of
icy ponds etched into the landscape. And all season long, peregrine falcons
and rough-legged hawks nest in the bluffs along the Colville River as
it arcs northward to the Beaufort Sea."
Notice what is missing from that description? People, that's what's missing.
My people, the Inupiat people. We are as much a part of that land as any
caribou herd or peregrine falcon. But the people in the lower 48 don't
hear about us. Everything north of the Brooks Range is presented as some
kind of pristine wilderness that has never seen the footsteps of man.
If we are ever going to convince the rest of this country that development
can and has happened in a safe and environmentally sound fashion, then
the only people who can carry that message with credibility are the Inupiat
people. And the message must be carried to the average American who can
relate to such simple issues as jobs and basic sanitary services. We need
to put people onto the map of the North Slope.
I believe that the Inupiat are your best weapons in this endeavor. We
have been stewards of this land for many thousands of years. Our footprints
have always appeared nest to that of the polar bear, the caribou, and
the geese. Our land has never been a virgin wilderness untouched by man.
My people have always used its resources to survive. As such, we have
the right and responsibility to see that our land continues to be used
to the benefit of our people. There was a time when that meant unrestricted
access to fish and game. But as we enter the 21st century, that definition
is changing to mean access to the vast wealth of our land in order to
maintain the basic services local government now provides. And I do mean
basic services - flush toilets and clean water are not considered luxuries
anywhere else in this country and they should not be considered luxuries
in the Bush.
I propose that we consider the following approaches to the problem of
creating an understanding of Alaska and its needs to the policy makers
and people in the lower forty eight. The first approach would be to Disney
Chairman Michael Eisner. If congress wants to tie up our most valuable
resources in untouchable land parcels, then let's just invite Disney in
and let them create "Alaska World". They can hire every citizen in
this state to be an employee by virtue of just being a resident. That
would take care of both our unemployment and trash problem because - as
I'm sure you all know - trash is not allowed in Disney theme parks.
If this solution doesn't capture them, then the only other viable program
is one that allows Alaskans to develop their resources to sustain their
economy. We must show the rest of America that Alaska is a mature, responsible
state that can plot the course of its own destiny.
A lot of time and money has been spent bringing members of Congress and
their staff to the North Slope to see the coastal plains of ANWR and the
National Petroleum Reserve. While this has had some success as a persuasive
tool, the reality is that Alaskans didn't elect these congressmen to office
and Alaskans won't be voting to re-elect them. The people of their state
did that and they are the people we need to focus on.
What I am proposing here is no quick fits. I am proposing a long term,
sustained effort. We need to make people in the lower 48 fully understand
not only the vastness of the state compared to the relatively small areas
we want to develop, but also that the needs of the people here are the
same as people's needs anywhere else. We need to develop our resources
to sustain our economy to create jobs that allow us to feed, clothe and
house our families. We must make a connection with the people of the lower
48 and then let them tell their legislators how they want them to vote.
Alaska sometimes prides itself on claiming that we are different from
the rest of the country - we do things our way. Well, as delightfully
colorful as that may be to people who love the idea of living on the last
frontier, it has also harmed us in that people in the rest of the country
sometimes find it hard to relate to us. While I don't think we will ever
convince most people that 25 below just isn't as bad as it sounds - when
it's a dry cold - we should be able to convince them that we have more
in common than not.
The Inupiat people have come to more than a living accommodation with
industry on the North Slope. We have come to view them as partners and
friends in our efforts to bring our people the services routinely enjoyed
by most other Americans Now that we have forged that bond, our next task
is to use that bond to bring Alaska and Alaskans to the lower 48. Bring
my people to Maine and California. Let them talk to the people of those
states about what it was like before we had tax dollars to spend on services.
Let my people express their love of the land and its wildlife. Give them
the opportunity to educate people to the fact that we would never allow
the sacred trust we hold with our ancestors for our children to be violated.
And then let them tell their senators and congressmen how Alaska should
be treated.
Thank you for your attention this morning. I hope to have a chance to
spend some time with each of you today to share these ideas more fully.
I know that if we work together, we can create a sensible development
policy for this state that will satisfy all but the most extreme fringes
of any concerned group.
|